Limited Hangout Designed to Conceal the Entrenched Government Censorship Infrastructure
Pierre Omidyar Owns The Intercept, Which Revealed Illegal Government Censorship, but Omidyar at the Same Time Funds the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure
The Intercept ran an explosive story allegedly obtained from leaked DHS documents that prove the government's collusion with major media outlets to curb free speech and spin people toward government propaganda. But that article is, in reality, a limited hangout.
A limited hangout is where the media is working with bad guys in the government to present to the public a limited version of actual events to serve as a kind of pressure valve designed to assuage suspicion. But the limited version of events spins the people away from the real crux of the criminality. This allows the bad guys to go their merry way and continue to engage in their nefarious conduct undetected and unhindered by public snooping.
David Brown perhaps gives the best explanation of how a limited hangout works.
There is a term of art in politics and among intelligence professionals that is known as the “limited hangout.” Whenever one’s veil of secrecy is penetrated, spies or politicians can employ misdirection to distract the public. The technique involves disclosing a self-contained and sensational but relatively benign story to overshadow something more damaging. It’s a non-confession, with the agency or individual seeming to “lay all the cards on the table,” and assuage concerns that anyone is trying to hide anything. Upon learning the “truth” as presented, the public is mollified and moves on with no real scrutiny of note, missing the real story altogether.
Dr. SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT Ph.D., the inventor of email, reveals the astounding fact that Pierre Omidyar owns The Intercept. Pierre Omidyar has been instrumental in establishing the marriage of big tech and the government to censor free speech. Dr. Shiva explains that The Intercept article is a "Limited Hangout to censor Dr. SHIVA's work and to conceal the involvement of Pierre Omidyar in the creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA two years ago in his 2020 historic Federal Lawsuit. They [The Intercept] executed concealment, plagiarism, misattribution, prevarication & manipulation, hijacking and amplification of their half-truth."
The purpose of The Intercept’s limited hangout was to give the impression that the government censorship was limited in scope to DHS “monitoring social media” and putting “pressure on private platforms.” In reality, there is a massive and deeply entrenched media censorship infrastructure involving the pervasive control by NGOs and government agencies of every major media outlet in the land. In the United States, there is a massive and entrenched censorship conspiracy. But you would never understand that by reading The Intercept’s article. That was the whole idea. Below is Dr. Shiva’s chart introduced during his federal lawsuit that reveals some of the persons and organizations involved in the entrenched government censorship infrastructure. That is the information that The Intercept was distracting its readers from knowing.
The Intercept’s Pierre Omidyar is not only the funder and a founder of the Intercept, but ALSO, the SAME PERSON who funded the creation of the Government & Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA over two years ago based on his findings from his historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit. Those findings and source material were published on this website, and have been here for well over two years.
Indeed, Omidyar funds intelligence community cutouts that control media and orchestrate regime changes. He is described as “one of the most quietly influential billionaires in helping to shape the media landscape.” Alexander Rubenstein and Max Blumenthal writing for Mint Press News revealed this bit of information that suggests close links between Omidyar and the NSA:
In May 2017, The Intercept partnered with Rappler to publish a series of signals intelligence leaks that revealed the contents of a chummy phone conversation between President Donald Trump and Duterte. How these leaks were obtained (NSA SIGINTs?) was left unexplained. But the Omidyar connection — he was a key backer of both outlets — was undeniable. Thus, the journalistic logrolling continued. (emphasis added)
You would think that the ACLU would be all over this media fixing. But you would be wrong. Dr. Shiva explains:
At the time, given Dr. SHIVA running for office as a Republican, he was shocked why the A.C.L.U. would not do anything, not even one re-sharing of his findings that exposed a total violation of the First Amendment. Dr. SHIVA’s counsel – member of the A.C.L.U. – told him, “they know about your lawsuit, but the A.C.L.U. has become highly politicized, and they will never cover it.”
Later, this same person sent Dr. SHIVA this article in the NY Times that states that if you are not a “progressive,” then the A.C.L.U. would look the other way.
However, the A.C.L.U. jumped to share the Intercept’s “DHS Leaks” dribble plagiarized from Dr. SHIVA. Pierre Omidyar, the Intercept’s funder and funder, has donated millions to the A.C.L.U. The “DHS Leaks” was a cover up – a Limited Hangout – to conceal Omidyar’s involvement in the funding and creation of the Government and Big Tech Censorship Infrastructure discovered by Dr. SHIVA during his historic 2020 Federal Lawsuit.
Tucker Carlson was fully informed about Dr. Shiva’s findings; he refused to report on it; he purposefully concealed it from the public. But when the limited hangout article from The Intercept was published, Tucker Carlson was all too happy to interview the authors and trumpet that news. Carlson said about The Intercept article, “This seems like a really important story, which for some reason is being ignored.” What he did not tell his audience was that it was only part of the story, it was a limited hangout, and he was the one who had ignored the much bigger story for the past two years. Tucker Carlson is a gatekeeper. He is a shill for the intelligence agencies. Like virtually all major media pundits, his job is to conceal and spin rather than reveal and inform.