Pfizer's Admission That Their Vaccine Was Never Tested for Stopping the Spread of COVID-19 Does Not Address the Elephant in the Room
President Joe Biden has repeatedly stated that the COVID-19 vaccines prevent the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, that is it whole purpose of his unconstitutional executive orders requiring federal workers, federal contractors, and the private sector to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. In an October 7, 2021 speech Joe Biden stated:
We still had more than a quarter of people in the United States who were eligible for vaccinations but didn’t get the shot.
And we know there is no other way to beat the pandemic than to get the vast majority of Americans vaccinated. It’s as simple as that.
And to — to spread to our children, to spread throughout society and at our hospitals the risk of other variants — it’s all dangerous and obvious, but we’re still not there.
We have to beat this thing. So, while I didn’t race to do it right away, that’s why I’ve had to move toward requirements that everyone get vaccinated or I had the authority to do that. That wasn’t my first instinct.
My administration is now requiring federal workers to be vaccinated. We’ve also required federal contractors to be vaccinated. If you have a contract with the federal government, working for the federal government, you have to be vaccinated.
We’re requiring active duty military to be vaccinated. We’re making sure healthcare workers are vaccinated, because if you seek care at a healthcare facility, you should have the certainty that the pro- — the people providing that care are protected from COVID and cannot spread it to you.
The Labor Department is going to shortly issue an emergency rule — which I asked for several weeks ago, and they’re going through the process — to require all employees [employers] with more than 100 people, whether they work for the federal government or not — this is within a — in the purview of the Labor Department — to ensure their workers are fully vaccinated or face testing at least once a week.
In total, this Labor Department vaccination requirement will cover 100 million Americans, about two thirds of all the people who work in America.
And here’s the deal: These requirements are already proving that they work.
***
But don’t take it from me. Not from some, you know, liberal think tank this comes from. But here’s what Wall Street is saying:
Goldman Sachs, quote: “Vaccinations will have a positive impact on employment.” It means less spread of COVID-19, which will help people return to work. 1
On October 10, 2022, we found out that Pfizer never even tested their vaccine for whether it would prevent transmission of the COVID-19 virus. The CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla refused to testify before the European Parliament. Janine Small, President of International Markets at Pfizer testified in his stead. She testified before the European Parliament that Pfizer never tested their vaccine to determine if it would prevent the spread of the virus. At the hearing, Bob Roos, a Dutch European Parliament member, asked Small “was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?” 2 Small answered: "No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market." 3
That astounding admission hit the public like a bomb because it undermines the basis for vaccine mandates. The whole concept behind the mandates was to prevent the spread of the virus from one person to another. But that admission by Small misses the elephant in the room. That elephant in the room is the issue of whether the COVID-19 vaccines even prevent infection from the beginning. Pfizer did not test for whether the vaccine would prevent transmission because they knew to begin with that it would not stop infection. Pfizer knew that their COVID-19 vaccine was ineffective in doing what vaccines are supposed to do, provide immunity from infection. Pfizer’s vaccine does not work, and they know it. Logically, if the vaccine cannot prevent transmission, that means it cannot prevent infection. In order for someone to spread the virus they must be infected from the beginning. Thus, the key issue is stopping the infection. Of course, if the vaccine stops infection, it will necessarily stop the spread. Because if a person is not infected with a disease, he cannot transmit the disease; a person cannot spread something he does not have. All government officials knew from the beginning that the COVID-19 vaccines would not prevent infection and consequently would not prevent the spread of the virus.
Please understand that the COVID-19 virus does not actually exist. It has never been isolated. Vaccinated people who are testing positive for COVID-19 do not actually have “breakthrough” COVID-19. They are testing positive for COVID-19 because the tests are rigged to provide false positive results. The “breakthrough” patients actually are suffering from an autoimmune disease known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) caused by the COVID-19 vaccines. ADE is being falsely labeled as COVID-19, when in fact it is an autoimmune disease caused by the vaccine. Indeed, it seems that is the purpose of the vaccine; it is a kill shot.
Please be mindful that the COVID-19 vaccines were authorized because they purportedly prevented infection and the spread of the disease. Dr. Hilary Marston of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease at the NIH, gave a presentation during an October 22, 2020 meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. 4 That meeting was before the issuance of the EUAs for the COVID-19 vaccines. During her presentation, she explained that the primary endpoint for all COVID-19 vaccine studies was to prevent COVID-19. Below is one of her slides where it states: “Primary Endpoint: Prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease (PCR confirmed).” 5
Indeed, the pertinent criteria announced by the FDA for the EUA granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine said nothing about lessening symptoms. The criteria for the EUA was simply that the vaccine may be effective in “preventing” COVID-19.
Based on the totality of scientific evidence available to FDA, it is reasonable to believe that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19, and that, when used under the conditions described in this authorization, the known and potential benefits of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine when used to prevent COVID-19 outweigh its known and potential risks. 6
And when on August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the substantially similar COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA), it said nothing about lessening symptoms. The FDA only mentioned the alleged effectiveness of the approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA stated that that “[t]he [approved] vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.” 7
When it became clear, though, that the vaccines were ineffective in preventing COVID-19, the standard for effectiveness had to be changed to something else. The standard for effectiveness is now no longer prevention of COVID-19 infection or preventing the spread of COVID-19. The standard has shifted to lessening the symptoms of COVID-19. It seems that the vaccine manufacturers and the CDC knew from the beginning that the COVID-19 vaccines would be ineffetive in preventing the spread of the disease. Indeed, as early as October 26, 2020, prior to the EUA issuance, Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), stated that preventing infection with COVID-19 was only a secondary endpoint. The primary purpose of the vaccine was not to prevent infection or spread but rather only to lessen symptoms. 8
Dr. Fauci claims that preventing COVID-19 is only a secondary endpoint of the vaccines. He made that statement just four (4) days after his subordinate, Dr. Hilary Marston, gave a presentation during an October 22, 2020 meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, where she explained that the primary endpoint of the COVID-19 vaccine trials was the prevention of COVID-19. 9
Please recall that before the FDA issuance of the EUA for the Moderna vaccine, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks stated on or before November 23, 2020: “our results show that this vaccine can prevent you from being sick, it can prevent you from being severely sick. They do not show that it prevents you from potentially carrying this virus transiently and infecting others.” 10 Yet, the basis on which the EUA was granted to Moderna was that it was allegedly effective in preventing infection. There was no basis for authorizing the EUA based on the vaccines ability to only lessening the symptoms of COVID-19, while not preventing infection. Moderna limited the measure of efficacy for their COVID-19 vaccine, in pertinent part, as follows: “The primary efficacy endpoint was efficacy of the vaccine to prevent protocol-defined COVID-19 occurring at least 14 days after the second dose in participants with negative SARS-CoV-2 status at baseline.” 11 The EUA was based on the representation by Moderna that their study proved that the vaccine would prevent infection. But the Moderna’s Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks knew from the beginning that the vaccine was ineffective in preventing infection, and he said so.
The efficacy studies done for the EUA only measured the prevention of COVID-19. There was no publication of any studies that were the basis for EUA that measured lowering symptoms. For example, When you read page 35 of the Pfizer-BioNtech publication titled Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine, it reveals that the only criterion reported for establishing the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine is the subsequent infection rate in the study groups. 12 The study compared the COVID-19 infection rate among the vaccine group and the placebo group to come up with an effectiveness of 95% for the COVID-19 vaccine. The study announced that the “Vaccine Efficacy” was based upon a finding of the “First COVID-19 Occurrence From 7 Days After Dose 2.” 13
That fact sheet indicates that “FDA issued this EUA, based on Pfizer-BioNTech’s request and submitted data. Although limited scientific information is available, based on the totality of the scientific evidence available to date, it is reasonable to believe that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals as specified in the Full EUA Prescribing Information.” 14
Pfizer-BiNTech and the FDA now claim that the COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent COVID-19 but only lessen the symptoms of the disease. But lowering symptoms was not a criterion of the study. The study and approval under the EUA were based on the vaccine's purported ability to prevent COVID-19.
This bait and switch strategy was brought to light publically when on January 30, 2021, Andrew Court reported for The Daily Mail that “Democrat Rep. Stephen Lynch has tested positive to COVID-19 after receiving both shots of the Pfizer vaccine.” 15 In a that news article it was explained that the reason that Rep. Lynch was infected with COVID-19 after being vaccinated is that “Pfizer’s vaccine does not necessarily prevent COVID-19 infection, but is said to be 95 percent effective in stopping the serious symptoms that are caused by the coronavirus.” 16
Pfizer-BioNtech announced that their COVID-19 vaccine was 95% effective in "preventing" COVID-19. They did NOT announce that it was 95% effective in reducing symptoms of COVID-19. The FDA allowed the EUA of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine because the COVID-19 vaccine study claimed a 95% effectiveness in “preventing” the recipient from getting COVID-19 after they had been vaccinated. 17 Indeed, the FDA states the reason for the EUA of the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine was that it is theorized to be effective in “preventing” the COVID-19 infection. The FDA explicitly states:
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is authorized to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. 18
The argument that the COVID-19 vaccines lessen symptoms is a smokescreen. The report from Britain’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Patrick Vallance, proves it. He stated that 40% of all COVID-19 patients being admitted to hospitals with COVID-19 are fully vaccinated. 19 That fact alone proves that the COVID-19 vaccines do not lessen symptoms. Persons are admitted to the hospital when they have severe symptoms. The fact 40% of those being hospitalized for COVID-19 are fully vaccinated indicates that the patients are suffering severe symptoms and thus the vaccines do not lessen the symptoms. You cannot have droves of vaccinated people jamming into hospitals after coming down with COVID-19 and maintain that the vaccines lessen symptoms.
Indeed, the FDA explicitly states that it does not know if the Pfizer-BiNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduces symptoms. The FDA has stated that the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine has been authorized under the EUA hoping that it will “prevent” COVID-19 and NOT in the hope it will reduce the severity of COVID-19.
To date, only a small number of severe cases have occurred during the study, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the vaccine reduces the severity of COVID-19. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is authorized to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. 20
The CDC has expressed hope that the COVID-19 vaccines will prevent infection, but the evidence is that the vaccines do no such thing. The CDC claims that a person who is vaccinated is unlikely to be infected with COVID-19, but then they give the following guidance, which suggests that they know that the likelihood of a vaccinated person getting COVID-19 is significant:
Fully vaccinated people who have come into close contact with someone with COVID-19 should be tested 3-5 days following the date of their exposure and wear a mask in public indoor settings for 14 days or until they receive a negative test result. They should isolate if they test positive. 21
That advice indicates that the CDC has no confidence in the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in preventing the disease.
CDC Director, Dr. Rachelle Walensky has even less faith in the COVID-19 vaccines. She revealed that not only do the vaccines not lessen the symptoms, but NPR reports that "Walensky noted that data from Israel suggests ‘increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early.'" 22
Writing for Roll Call, Emily Kopp reported that data presented at a confidential congressional briefing showed that “[u]p to 15 percent of deaths in May were among vaccinated people.” 23
A government report from Public Health England reveals that persons who have been vaccinated are six (6) times more likely to die from the delta variant of the SARS-COV-2 (a.k.a. COVID-19) than those who are unvaccinated. 24 The report shows that 26 out of 4,087 fully vaccinated persons died from the variant. Whereas 34 out of 35,521 unvaccinated persons died from the variant. 25 That is a 665% greater death rate among the vaccinated group. So much for lessening symptoms.
If it has now been shown that the vaccine is truly ineffective in “preventing” a vaccine recipient from getting COVID-19, it should be announced as ineffective. The vaccine should be taken off the market. Apparently, that will not happen. Instead, there is now being announced a new criterion for effectiveness that was never studied. And that new criteria is lessening of symptoms. This bait and switch strategy for vaccines has been around since the 1800's. Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals that “[w]hen it was clear that the smallpox vaccine was not able to prevent disease, the medical profession tried to justify vaccination by changing the goalposts from lifelong ‘perfect’ immunity to “milder disease.’” 26 Dr. Humphries revealed that bait and switch from immunity to milder symptoms was used to justify getting ineffective pertussis and influenza vaccines in 2013.
Endnotes
1
Remarks by President Biden on the Importance of COVID-?19 Vaccine Requirements, Data Center, Clayco Construction Site Elk Grove Village, Illinois, October 7, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/10/07/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-importance-of-covid-19-vaccine-requirements/.
2
Special Committee on COVID-19 Pandemic, European Parliament, October 10, 2022, at 15:23:00, https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI.
3
Special Committee on COVID-19 Pandemic, European Parliament, October 10, 2022, at 15:23:00, https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI.
4
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee - 10/22/2020, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, at 2:33:40,
.
5
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee - 10/22/2020, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, at 2:33:40,
.
6
Denise M. Hinton, Chief Scientist, FDA, Letter to Pfizer Inc., Attention: Ms. Elisa Harkins, August 23, 2021, https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download.
7
FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine, FDA, August 23, 2021, https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine.
8
Anjalee Khemlani, Fauci: Early COVID-19 Vaccines Will Only Prevent Symptoms, Not Block the Virus, Yahoo Finance, October 20, 2020, https://www.yahoo.com/now/fauci-vaccines-will-only-prevent-symptoms-not-block-the-virus-195051568.html.
9
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee - 10/22/2020, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, at 2:33:40,
.
10
AXIOS on HBO: Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks (Clip) | HBO, November 23, 2020,
.
11
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 17, 2020, FDA Briefing Document, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, https://www.fda.gov/media/144434/download.
12
Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) Emergency Use Authorization (Eua) of the Pfizer-biontech COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus, Disease 2019 (Covid-19), 12 August 2021, https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
13
Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) Emergency Use Authorization (Eua) of the Pfizer-biontech COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus, Disease 2019 (Covid-19), 12 August 2021, https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
14
Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) Emergency Use Authorization (Eua) of the Pfizer-biontech COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus, Disease 2019 (Covid-19), 12 August 2021, https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download.
15
Andrew Court, Democrat Congressman Stephen Lynch, 65, Tests Positive to COVID-19 after Receiving Both Doses of Pfizer's Vaccine, The Daily Mail, January 30, 2021, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9205321/Rep-Stephen-Lynch-65-tests-positive-COVID-19-receiving-doses-Pfizer-vaccine.html?ito=push-notification&ci=73039&si=23070647.
16
Andrew Court, Democrat Congressman Stephen Lynch, 65, Tests Positive to COVID-19 after Receiving Both Doses of Pfizer's Vaccine, The Daily Mail, January 30, 2021, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9205321/Rep-Stephen-Lynch-65-tests-positive-COVID-19-receiving-doses-Pfizer-vaccine.html?ito=push-notification&ci=73039&si=23070647.
17
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions, FDA, https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions (last visited on August 20, 2021).
18
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions, FDA, https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions (last visited on August 20, 2021).
19
60% of People Being Admitted to UK Hospitals Are Unvaccinated - Adviser, Reuters, July 19, 2021, https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/60-people-being-admitted-uk-hospitals-had-two-covid-jabs-adviser-2021-07-19/.
20
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions, FDA, https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions (last visited on August 20, 2021).
21
Interim Public Health Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People, CDC, August 19, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html.
22
Pien Huang, et al., COVID Booster Shots Are Coming. Here's What You Need To Know, NPR, August 19, 2021, https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/08/19/1028594715/covid-booster-shots-are-coming-heres-what-you-need-to-know.
23
Emily Kopp, CDC report shows vaccinated people can spread COVID-19, Roll Call, July 30, 2021, https://www.rollcall.com/2021/07/30/cdc-report-shows-vaccinated-people-can-spread-covid-19/.
24
SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern and Variants under Investigation in England, Technical Briefing, Public Health England, 18 June 2021, 16https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001359/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_16.pdf.
25
Id. at 12.
26
Suzanne Humphries, Dissolving Illusions, at 74 (2013).