Directed energy has certain characteristics that are unlike a fire. They leave behind telltale evidence. The rubble of Lahaina gives silent testimony that it was immolated by directed energy weapons.
Remember the AFRL explains that there are "two classes of DE [directed energy] weapons, high-energy lasers and high-powered microwave systems." A laser will burn wood and paper, while microwaves will not. What you must understand is that the trees that remained testify that the fires could NOT be from wildfires as claimed in the cover story. A wildfire would have burned the surrounding trees. Indeed, the surrounding trees would be the cause of the fires in the houses if there were truly wildfires. The operators targeted the houses with microwave and laser DEWs. There are some trees that suffered collateral damage from the lasers, but they did not target the trees with the lasers and so the vast majority of trees remained.
I think you need to read this blog on what happens in an ordinary wildfire. Trees don't burn down in fires. Dry seasoned wood typically doesn't burn unless something flammable is directly in contact - see the experiment. There are always miraculous survivals of things in fires.
Another great article by Edward Hendrie. Summary and link added to www.legitgov.org and it will be included in the next newsletter. Thank you for these important posts! BTW, the paper price tags on the T-shirts having survived the fires are reminiscent of the 9/11 "hijackers'" passports that were quickly located in the Manhattan rubble.
Please refrain from calling the unelected treasonous pedophile with dementia a president.
It is said Directed Energy will not burn wood trees. What were the houses that burnt made of ??
Remember the AFRL explains that there are "two classes of DE [directed energy] weapons, high-energy lasers and high-powered microwave systems." A laser will burn wood and paper, while microwaves will not. What you must understand is that the trees that remained testify that the fires could NOT be from wildfires as claimed in the cover story. A wildfire would have burned the surrounding trees. Indeed, the surrounding trees would be the cause of the fires in the houses if there were truly wildfires. The operators targeted the houses with microwave and laser DEWs. There are some trees that suffered collateral damage from the lasers, but they did not target the trees with the lasers and so the vast majority of trees remained.
WTF? haha
I think you need to read this blog on what happens in an ordinary wildfire. Trees don't burn down in fires. Dry seasoned wood typically doesn't burn unless something flammable is directly in contact - see the experiment. There are always miraculous survivals of things in fires.
https://madeleinelove.substack.com/p/devastation-and-miracles
Excellent analysis, thanks.
thank you
Another great article by Edward Hendrie. Summary and link added to www.legitgov.org and it will be included in the next newsletter. Thank you for these important posts! BTW, the paper price tags on the T-shirts having survived the fires are reminiscent of the 9/11 "hijackers'" passports that were quickly located in the Manhattan rubble.